Acts of U.G. Krishnamurti

Another Side of U.G. — in VII. Acts

I. — U.G. Begins His Ministry

In the year following his Calamity, in December 1967, U.G traveled from Switzerland, where he was living with his benefactress, a native older woman named Valentine, to India for the first time since the event, which happened in July 1967. In Madras (now Chennai), U.G. ran into a boyhood friend, and as U.G. was looking for a place to live, his friend recommended him to the Jagadguru of Sringeri Pitha, Abhinava Vidya Tirtha Swami, head teacher and monk of the shrine at Sringeri.

When the Swami of Sringeri heard of the Calamity that had befallen U.G., he said, “I must speak with you in private.” The Swami led U.G. and Valentine into his private chambers on the far side of the River Tunga, where he sat on the Guru Pitha (teacher’s seat), with Valentine and U.G. seated in front of him. Their meeting had become an official visit.

“When I heard of the extraordinary things that happened to you, I was reminded of my guru,” said the Jagadguru. “I don’t know from my personal experience, but my teacher used to describe his experiences in just the way they occurred in your case. We were afraid that perhaps he had lost his mind.”

The Swami continued: “It is very rare that the body survives the shock of such a thoughtless state. According to the scriptures, within twenty-one days after such an event, the body dies. If the body can sustain its vital force and does not die, surely it must be for the sake of saving humanity. There’s no doubt about it.”

U.G. had no inclination to save the world or uplift humanity, but he listened silently as the teacher spoke. Then he presented the Jagadguru with his proposal of establishing his residence near Sringeri, in a solitary place away from people.

The Jagadguru replied: “If you so wish, I will be responsible for getting you any place around here. But your idea of living alone will never work. Whether you stay in a jungle or a mountain cave, people won’t stop coming to see you.” The teacher’s warning made U.G. give up on the idea of living away from people.

In those days, Dr. K.B. Ramakrishna Rao was the head of a college in Sringeri. The Jagadguru invited him to visit and introduced him to U.G. One evening, Dr. Ramakrishna Rao and a group of his friends led U.G. and Valentine to the top of Rishyasringa Hill near the River Tunga. They all sat under a tree. The doctor and his friends were curious to hear the story of U.G.’s Calamity. U.G. indulged them — he narrated for about an hour all of the things that had happened to him. It was in Sringeri that U.G. probably started lecturing again, after he had quit in the United States many years earlier.

II. — The Sermon in the Cave

Brahmachariji was a renunciate (sannyasin) who later became a friend of U.G.’s. His real name was Shiva Rama Sarma, and some people called him Swami Sarma, but U.G.’s friends called him Brahmachariji.

He was brought up in a wealthy family from Mysore. He had graduated university with a Master of Science in Chemical Engineering and passed the civil service examination. He disliked government work, so for a number of years he worked as an assistant professor at the Indian Institute of Science. In middle age, Brahmachariji became increasingly detached from daily concerns and instead dedicated himself to spiritual life for four decades. All of his brothers were millionaires. U.G. used to tease him by saying, “The qualities of your brothers are active in your blood also.”

There is a legend that a former head of Sringeri Pitha, Chandrasekhara Bharati Swami, used to meditate in an ancient cave under a two-storey house near a big bodhi tree in the yard of the monastery. Abhinava Vidya Tirtha Swami allowed Brahmachariji to live in that cave, so Brahmachariji had a two-storey house built on the same site on the rocks and made it habitable.

In December 1969, at Brahmachariji’s invitation, U.G. visited the Cave. Later that evening, he began lecturing to a small crown of about twenty:

“There is no moksha (liberation), no jivanmukti (one liberated while still alive), and no Atman (imperishable Self). And there is no such thing as self-realization. Those are all lies. There is only the Natural State. I don’t like to use your terms, such as enlightenment, jivanmukti, nirvana or moksha to refer to this state. Those terms suggest some other meanings. They sound weird to me.

“When I talk about the Natural State, it is not the state of someone who has attained self-realization or God realization. It is not something created through self-effort. This Natural State is always living and spontaneous. It happens to one in a billion, accidentally. It does not result from your effort. It is acausal. And why the Natural State happens to that one and not anyone else, I don’t know.

“It’s foolish to try to purify your consciousness through some practices in order to attain the Natural State. The consciousness is so pure that all of the experiences which you consider holy and sacred are only a contamination of it. They are unbearable filth, intolerable contamination. Once the barriers in your consciousness are broken, once the floodgates are open, everything will be washed away — all experiences, good and bad, sacred and profane, divine or demonic, all divine visions, all ‘ultimate’ states will be washed away from the consciousness.

“Krishna consciousness, Buddha consciousness, God consciousness, sages, saints and prophets, Jesus, Mohammad, Mahavir, enlightened men, yogis — all of them must be washed away in that flood. It is only then that consciousness becomes clear. God consciousness, Buddha consciousness, extraordinary visions are all equal to dirt. Until they are flushed out, consciousness will not become clear.

“You must believe my words. There is nothing permanent. Permanent happiness and infinite wisdom are illusory notions created by the nostril-closing phonies who endlessly discuss, ‘This is real, that is unreal,’ and who have nothing better to do. You trust those people and lose interest in things that are real, and then search for nonexistent things. If that’s not slipping into a lowly state, what is?”

All of the ancient sages who had taken residence in Chandrasekhar’s (the author’s) blood boiled in anger at U.G.’s words. “You say there is no God! You say God is an illusion man has created out of fear. Then you don’t think there is a power beyond the reach of the mind that orders this universe?”

U.G. replied: “I will say with certainty that there is no superior power outside of man and different from him. If there is any such power, that power is not different from you. The lowly mosquito sucking your blood is an expression of that divine power. That’s why I say it is irrelevant to discuss the question of God.

“Unless you abandon the idea of God in yourself, the life in you cannot carry on. Before the body dies and becomes immobile, God must die in you. That is true immortality. Living is only possible after God dies.”

U.G. in 1972, aged 54. Uncredited.

III. — U.G. Founds an Ashram

On September 30, 1979, U.G. and Valentine arrived in Bangalore by plane, having traveled from Hyderabad. The house that had been rented for them wouldn’t be ready for another few days, so it was arranged for them to stay temporarily at Jñana Ashram, the Abode of Wisdom, located about twenty kilometers south of Bangalore. There is an interesting story behind this ashram.

After Brahmachariji, with great difficulty, avoided the possible misfortune of ascending to the Seat of Kudli Math, U.G. created for him the opportunity to build the ashram. With his ingenuity and incessant hard work, Brahmachari transformed into a luscious garden the seven-acre barren land donated to him by the government. He also built the Shakti Ganapati Temple in the ashram, and in the course of time also built a school, a guesthouse, and housing for the staff.

Brahmachariji said he owed it all to U.G. When U.G. first saw the barren land, he put two rupees he had left from a taxi ride into Brahmachariji’s hand and told him it was U.G.’s donation for building an ashram. Ever since that gesture, everything Brahmachariji touched turned to gold.

Early the next morning, about five o’clock, U.G. came and sat in the living room. “Last night that cobra came to visit me,” he said. Whenever he visited the ashram, a giant cobra, almost twenty feet long (six meters), would come and visit him at least once. It would make loud noises with its hood to wake him. U.G. would open the back door of his room and go out to walk with the cobra for a while.

“Maybe because of the big rain last night, the snake was not as fast as before. It crawled and moved more slowly. Still, how awe-inspiring it looks when it crawls in its zigzag fashion!” Other people at the ashram normally couldn’t find it, but the cook would sometimes feed milk to it. The cobra seemed to know when U.G. was at the ashram — it would visit him at night, then disappear.

“In this desolate place, that cobra has been protecting me for all these years. Some great person is visiting in this form,” said Brahmachariji.

IV. — “This Is the Palm of Vishnu Himself!”

A few days after U.G. and Valentine came to stay at Jñana Ashram, in early October 1979, they were joined by two of U.G.’s friends, film director Mahesh Bhatt and actress Parveen Babi. The same evening they arrived, the whole group — U.G., Valentine, Mahesh and Parveen — drove to Mysore, where they were received warmly by Prof. Ramakrishna Rao of Mysore University, who put them up in the university guesthouse.

The next day, on October 4, 1979, U.G., Mahesh, Brahmachariji and some friends of Brahmachariji’s were all sitting in the hall of the guesthouse and talking. U.G. seemed to enjoy making fun of Brahmachariji whenever he had the chance. Sometimes U.G. would cross a line and Brahmachariji would fly into a rage. Then they would both calm down and laugh very loudly.

On that day, however, Brahmachariji was in a terrible mood. As if U.G. didn’t notice any of that, he kept making fun of Brahmachari: “A prostitute is more honest with herself than you are: she only sells her body for her livelihood, but you had to stoop to peddling Vedanta? After so much education and becoming a civil service officer, why did you have to stoop to selling Shankaracharya?”

Brahmachariji was furious that he was being ridiculed before others. “Mahesh, I’m not going to stay with this man for one more minute! When the professor, our host, returns, tell him I went back to Bangalore!” Without heeding Mahesh’s pleas, Brahmachariji rushed out of the house.

“U.G., Brahmachariji is really leaving in anger!” shouted Mahesh. But U.G. said quietly, “Don’t worry, he’s not going anywhere. He’ll be back, just wait and see.”

Meanwhile, as Brahmachariji went on his way, he ran into Prof. Rao. All his anger returned, and he shouted at the professor, “What kind of demon are you hosting here? Is he a wise man or a great demon?” Ramakrishna Rao tried to comfort the sannyasin, treating him like a dear friend and speaking gently to him.

As this went on, a passing Brahmin saw them and begged pitifully: “Sirs, I am hungry. Please give me a rupee. I will read your palms and tell your fortune.” Prof. Rao saw a great opportunity in this. “Brahmachari, I agree with you. I’m on your side. I have an idea. Let’s take this palmist with us and expose U.G.’s true colors! If it turns out that he’s a trickster and a phony, we’ll drive him out of the house! Come, let’s go home!”

Brahmachariji was pacified. He shouted at the Brahmin: “Hey, you, Brahmin! You must look at someone’s palm and tell us the exact truth! If you read his hand carefully and tell us what kind of man he is, I’ll give you ten rupees! But if you talk gibberish, I’ll make your head ring! Be ready!”

In a few minutes they were back at the house. Brahmachari curtly asked U.G. to show his hand to the palmist. U.G. obliged and stretched out both of his arms to show his palms like a good boy. The thin Brahmin looked at U.G.’s right hand for a couple of minutes and started blinking and howling with wide eyes: “Ohohohoho!”

“Speak, man! Speak clearly in words!” said Brahmachariji, grabbing the Brahmin by the arm. The Brahmin didn’t hear him and kept on studying the palm. A little while later, he exclaimed again: “Abababa, ahahaha!” He was gloating in ecstasy. Brahmachariji couldn’t contain his anger any longer and was getting ready to hit the Brahmin. “Are you going to say something in words, or should I break your head?!”

“Sir, what can I say!” responded the Brahmin. “I’ve never seen a palm like this in all my life! It surpasses the Rama avatar and the Krishna avatar! Truly, this is the palm of Srimannarayana — the palm of Vishnu himself!”

Brahmachariji was stunned. He couldn’t utter a word in reply; instead he collapsed onto the sofa. U.G. assessed the scene, turned to the palmist and made an offer: “If you can look at his palm and tell me how many children he has, I’ll give you twenty rupees.” He showed the palmist Brahmachari’s hand. After scrutinizing it for a minute, the Brahmin laughed. “Why, he is a staunch bachelor, sir! He has never married, so how can he have children?”

Brahmachari joined the roomful of people laughing at this accurate assessment. That day, U.G. and Brahmachariji tested each other and found out that what the other person was made of was genuine.

U.G. in 1979, aged 61. Uncredited.

V. — U.G. Listens to and Corrects Mantras

It was a winter night, perhaps in December 1976. The cold wind outside was penetrating through the holes of the closed doors. We all sat down to listen to Brahmachariji’s recitation of the Ganapati Upanishad. U.G. sat on a rug on the floor in the lotus posture. Brahmachariji sat facing him. The recitation went on for about twenty minutes. All that time U.G. sat motionless, with eyes closed, in the lotus position.

The things U.G. recounted after the recitation stunned everyone. “I feel as if the sounds of the mantras were coming out of myself. I experienced the sound going round in circles in a kind of rhythm, and spreading throughout my consciousness. Suddenly all that took the shape of Ganapati (the elephant-headed god, son of Shiva and Parvati, also known as Ganesh). In my consciousness my face became the face of Ganapati. My nose stretched and drooped down like an elephant’s trunk. Then, as though something snapped, it all disappeared. The movement stopped. The form was erased. Maybe there was some mistake in the recitation at that point.”

Brahmachariji admitted that was true. He said he forgot the mantra at a certain place, so he repeated those portions of the mantra, to the end, without errors. “Now it’s all correct. There was no gap in the movement. Everything is quite rhythmical.”

How was it possible that U.G. could have that experience? He explained it as something like the first wax cylinders imprinted with sound waves that could later be restored as sounds. Or in his case, U.G. explained it as sound waves transformed into electromagnetic waves transformed into light waves, which can then be transformed back into sound waves. “Because there is no division here,” he said, pointing to himself, all those sounds, along with the forms embedded in them, have echoed in my consciousness.”

Another time, also in October 1979, U.G. traveled to Ooty in Tamil Nadu, the southernmost state in India, to see his devotee, Dr. Kameswari. Almost as soon as she was born, her father taught Kameswari to worship the goddess Lalita Parameswari. She dedicated her life to the Goddess. She got married, had children and became an army doctor, but her world was always immersed in the Goddess.

Kameswari’s joy knew no bounds when she learned that U.G. was coming to visit her, for the first time, along with Parveen and Mahesh. As soon as U.G. and company stepped into her house, she had one foot in the kitchen and the other in the living room. Unable to stand it, U.G. settled himself in the kitchen as they talked, occasionally tasting her cooking and improving it with salt (U.G. loved salt). He even kept her company during her puja offering, the daily worship she performed at home. He asked her to utter the mantra out loud as she was meditating. When she finished, he said, “Good, perfect.”

One day, while Kameswari was doing puja, U.G. said: “Parts of the mantras are very powerful. They feel as if a great energy is flowing. But in some places the flow is interrupted. If you recite them out loud, I will correct them.” When she recited them again the next day as he corrected them, he said, “Now they sound right.”

Once U.G. commented on Kameswari’s puja: “When she recites those mantras, the sounds cause strange movements and experiences in me. It must be such experiences some people strive for when they do japa (uttering holy names) and tapas (austerities).”

The question came up, “No matter how mechanically they are recited, is it right to brush them aside as foolish?” “No, you mustn’t,” replied U.G. It wasn’t his style to condemn any practice as foolish if it was done sincerely and with a pure heart.

VI. — U.G. Visits a Temple

During the same visit to Prof. Ramakrishna Rao at Mysore University, the professor offered to take the group for a look at Chamundeshwari Temple. The news of U.G.’s visit to the temple preceded them, and by the time they arrived, a priest from the neighboring Lakshmi Narayana Temple by the name of Anandaji had arranged everything.

The priests of Chamundeshwari led the group directly into the inner sanctum, which was an honor not normally accorded even to the Maharajah. It was inconceivable that a foreigner like Valentine and worldly people like Parveen and Mahesh, considered untouchable by orthodox Hindus, would be led into the inner sanctum, where even orthodox Brahmins would not normally be allowed.

A special ceremony was performed for them. The holy relics were brought out — the sacred conch belonging to the Goddess, called Pancha Janya, and the Sri Chakra, the holy wheel carved with syllables on a precious metal plate — and U.G. was allowed to touch them. From the moment he stepped into the inner sanctum, U.G. felt the effects of the strong vibrations in there. He appeared to be in a trance or a semi-conscious state. The Sri Chakra and the Pancha Janya had a profound effect on him, and at one point he nearly collapsed. Brahmachariji caught him and steadied him.

Brahmachariji later said there were vertical marks on U.G.’s forehead, like the white marks worn by worshippers of Vishnu, and for the duration of his stay in the temple, another mark around his neck in the form of a serpent. When asked about these swellings, U.G. attempted to explain them scientifically. He said the worship by the priests was done with great devotion, and the yantras of geometric diagrams on metal plates filled the inner sanctum with powerful vibrations. The marks were simply U.G.’s body reacting to those vibrations. “They come and go,” he said. “Sometimes they happen when I’m on the toilet.”

An image of a yantra on a metal plate.

VII. — Ascension after 40 Years

It’s true, U.G. is no longer with us. He passed away in Italy in March 2007, aged 88, surrounded by his friends. If we think of U.G. the man, born on July 9, 1918, in the port city of Machilipatnam (Ma·chi·li·pat·nam) on the Bay of Bengal, it’s true that he is gone and will never exist again. Those who missed him will never have a chance to meet him. But I imagine he lives on as a bright band of violet light, fading to turquoise blue against the black of space, a unique frequency of light and self-aware.

Not only would he never read this post, my ‘Acts of U.G. Krishnamurti,’ but I imagine he would admonish me instead as follows:

“Why do you waste your time writing this drivel for no one’s benefit? Not only do you waste time twisting my words into something they’re not, which you are free to do, but you do it at work, on someone else’s dollar, shirking your work responsibilities to do so.

“You would be better off renting your ass by the half-hour under the freeway underpass than adding to the misery of the world by lionizing me and apotheosizing me with this ‘Life of U.G.’ Please.

“There’s nothing left of me, nothing to be remembered for. The sages know that all will eventually burn to ash, so they sing, Tryambakam yajamahe!’ — ‘We worship the Three-Eyed One,’ Lord Shiva who burns our ignorance to ashes.”

_________

The sensational stories given above, unavailable anywhere else in this condensed form, were compiled and adapted from K. Chandrasekhar’s Stopped in Our Tracks: Stories of U.G. in India (Winsome Books India, 2009), a collection of journal entries in their turn compiled and edited by Prof. J.S.R.L. Narayana Moorty (1934-2022).

Complete Wisdom of U.G. Krishnamurti

Uppaluri Gopala “U.G.” Krishnamurti (1918-2007), born in coastal Andhra Pradesh as a native speaker of Telugu, was a unique philosopher who expressed himself in a way the world had never heard before. He rejected all spirituality, all religion, all goals and all striving because they take you away from yourself, since they are rooted in the idea that the individual must be improved somehow — that you must be other than as you are. “Any effort in any direction is violence.”

Instead he prescribed total self-acceptance by rejecting all advice on “how” to live (“now you’ve made a problem out of life”), giving up all supports and completely surrendering to life. This must be a “total surrender — throwing in the towel, throwing in the sponge.” Enlightenment or self-liberation is utterly unattainable through personal effort because all personal effort comes from the “separative thought structure” which has no connection to life. Grace bestows liberation on “whomsoever it chooses,” not because the person deserves it but because that is the nature of grace.

The text below was extracted from two whole books — Mind Is a Myth and Mystique of Enlightenment, both transcribed from informal talks recorded by others — boiled down and arranged thematically into a complete picture of his philosophy, in his own words.

“Truth is a movement. You cannot capture it, contain it, give expression to it, or use it to advance your interests. The moment you capture it, it ceases to be the truth.”

“My aim is not some comfy dialectical thesis, but the total negation of everything that can be expressed. Anything you try to make out of my statements is not it.”

On Knowing and Experiencing

You will never know the truth, because it’s a movement. It’s a movement! You cannot capture it, you cannot contain it, you cannot express it. It’s not a logically ascertained premise that we are interested in. It’s a shocking thing because it’s going to destroy every nerve, every cell, even the cells in the marrow of your bones. I tell you, it’s not going to be an easy thing, it’s not going to be handed over to you on a gold platter. You have to become completely disillusioned, then the truth begins to express itself in its own way. I have discovered that it is useless to try to discover the truth. The search for truth is, I have discovered, absurd, because it’s a thing which you cannot capture, contain, or give expression to.

Your effort to control life has created a secondary movement of thought within you, which you call the “I.” This movement of thought within you is parallel to the movement of life, but isolated from it; it can never touch life. You are a living creature, yet you lead your entire life within the realm of this isolated, parallel movement of thought. You cut yourself off from life — that is something very unnatural.

Every time a thought is born, you are born. When the thought is gone, you are gone. But the “you” does not let the thought go, and what gives continuity to this “you” is the thinking. Actually there is no permanent entity in you, no totality of all your thoughts and experiences. You think that there is “somebody” who is thinking your thoughts, “somebody” who is feeling your feelings — that’s the illusion. I can say it’s an illusion; but it’s not an illusion to you.

Why can’t you leave the sensations alone? Why do you translate? You do this because if you do not communicate to yourself, you are not there. The prospect of that is frightening to the “you.” The senses function unnaturally in you because you want to use them to get something. Why should you get anything? Because you want what you call the “you” to continue. You are protecting that continuity. Thought is a protective mechanism: it protects the “you” at the expense of something or somebody else. Anything born out of thought is destructive: it will ultimately destroy you and your kind.

If there is any power in this universe, it is in you. You don’t let that power express itself, because that’s a thing that you cannot experience. You want to experience it. How is that possible? That power is something living, vital — it’s the throb, the pulse, the beat of life — you are one expression of that life, that’s all. How can you experience that?

This structure of thought, through which you experience, is dead; it cannot experience that life at all, because the one is something living and the other is dead, and there can’t be any relationship between the two. You can only experience dead things, not a living thing. Life has to express itself. This is a thing which nobody can teach you. You don’t have to get it from somebody; what you have is there.

On the Nature of Mind

Where is the mind, or the unconditioned mind? To me there is no such thing as mind; mind is a myth. There is nothing there to be transformed, radically or otherwise. There is no self to be realized. The whole religious structure that has been built on this foundation collapses because there is nothing there to realize.

You put me on the other side of the river. You want to cross in a boat. That boat is a leaky boat, and you will sink. There is no other bank, and there is no river to cross, no boat — it is very difficult for you to understand that. You have created an image and put the image on the other side. I say, “No, for goodness sake! I am on the same bank, there is no river to cross, and no boatman is necessary!”

On Awareness

You cannot be aware; you and awareness cannot co-exist. If you could be in a state of awareness for one second by the clock, once in your life, the continuity would be snapped, the illusion of the experiencing structure, the “you,” would collapse, and everything would fall into its natural rhythm. In this state you do not know what you are looking at — that is awareness. If you recognize what you are looking at, you are there, again experiencing the old, what you know.

On the Afterlife and the Soul

Your experiencing structure cannot conceive of any event that it will not experience. It even expects to preside over its own dissolution, and so it wonders what death will feel like — it tries to project the feeling of what it will be like not to feel. But in order to anticipate a future experience, your structure needs knowledge, a similar past experience it can call upon for reference. You cannot remember what it felt like not to exist before you were born, and you cannot remember your own birth, so you have no basis for projecting your future nonexistence.

As long as you have known life, you have known yourself, you have been there, so, to you, you have a feeling of eternity. To justify this feeling of eternity, your structure begins to convince itself that there will be a life after death for you — heaven, reincarnation, transmigration of souls, or whatever. What is it that you think reincarnates? Where is that soul of yours? Can you taste it, touch it, show it to me? What is there inside of you that goes to heaven? What is there? There is nothing inside of you but fear.

On Chakras

The problem is that anything you do — any movement in any direction, on any level — gives continuity to the structure of thought. Luckily, fortunately, there are certain areas in the human organism which are outside the control of thought. They are the glands, what you call the “ductless glands.” Fortunately and luckily, otherwise man is finished. The day you control them, that’s the end of man: he will lose everything, he will become — he is already — just a nut and bolt in the social structure. What little freedom he can have, what little opportunity there is for this personality to express itself, will be lost.

These glands are outside the control of thought — the pituitary gland, the pineal gland, the thymus gland, and so forth. The Hindus call them “chakras.” I don’t want to use the word “chakras”; I would call them “ductless glands.” Unless they are activated, any chance of human beings flowering into themselves is lost.

I can’t say there is any such thing as an evolutionary process, but there seems to be such an evolutionary process. What its nature is, what its purpose is, I do not know; but it seems to be trying to create something. Man remains incomplete, unless the whole of this human organism blooms into something, like a flower.

On Saints, Mystics and Sages

The saint or mystic is a secondhand man who experiences what the sages have talked about, so he is still in the field of duality, whereas the sages or seers are functioning in the undivided state of consciousness. The mystic experience is an extraordinary one because it is not an intellectual experience; it helps them to look at things differently, to feel differently, to experience things differently and to interpret the statements of the sages and seers for others.

All that you are doing to purify yourself has no meaning at all, because that purificatory talk is not going to help you at all. It can make you into a saint, but it cannot touch the other thing. So all your morality, and all your practicing this, that and the other, has no meaning. That is why the Upanishadic seers never talked of morality or sadhana; whereas the saints have emphasized them because they are second-class imitators. This kind of a thing, if it has to happen, will happen in spite of those things. And I maintain that it is genetically fixed: only in such a man does this kind of a thing happen.

On the Natural State

“That explosion hits life at a point that has never been touched before. It is absolutely unique. All that came before is negated in that fire.”

What makes one person come into his natural state, and not another person, I don’t know. Perhaps it’s written in the cells. It is acausal. It is not an act of volition on your part; you can’t bring it about. There is absolutely nothing you can do. You can distrust any man who tells you how he got into this state. One thing you can be sure of is that he cannot possibly know himself, and cannot possibly communicate it to you.

There is a built-in triggering mechanism in the body. If the experiencing structure of thought happens to let go, the other thing will take over in its own way. The functioning of the body will be a totally different functioning, without the interference of thought except when it is necessary to communicate with somebody. To put it in the boxing-ring phrase, you have to “throw in the towel,” be totally helpless. No one can help you, and you cannot help yourself.

This state is not in your interest. You are only interested in continuity. You want to continue, probably on a different level, and to function in a different dimension, but you want to continue somehow. You wouldn’t touch this with a barge pole. This is going to liquidate what you call “you,” all of you — higher self, lower self, soul, Atman, conscious, subconscious — all of that.

You come to a point and then you say, “I need time.” So sadhana [practice] comes into the picture, and you say to yourself, “Tomorrow I will understand.” This structure is born of time and functions in time, but does not come to an end through time. If you don’t understand now, you are not going to understand tomorrow. What is there to understand?

The personality does not change when you come into this state. You are, after all, a computer machine, which reacts as it has been programmed. It is in fact your present effort to change yourself that is taking you away from yourself and keeping you from functioning in the natural way. The personality will remain the same. Don’t expect such a man to become free from anger or idiosyncrasies. Don’t expect some kind of spiritual humility. Such a man may be the most arrogant person you have ever met, because he is touching life at a unique place where no man has touched before. It is for this reason that each person who comes into this state expresses it in a unique way, in terms relevant to his time.

What is keeping you from being in your natural state? You are constantly moving away from yourself. You want to be happy, either permanently or at least for this moment. You are dissatisfied with your everyday experiences, and so you want some new ones. You want to perfect yourself, to change yourself. You are reaching out, trying to be something other than what you are. It is this that is taking you away from yourself.

Society has put before you the ideal of a “perfect man.” No matter in which culture you were born, you have scriptural doctrines and traditions handed down to you to tell you how to behave. You are told that through due practice you can even eventually come into the state attained by the sages, saints and saviors of mankind. And so you try to control your behavior, to control your thoughts, to be something unnatural.

What is the difference whether or not you find this freedom, this enlightenment, or not? You will not be there to benefit from it. What possible good can this state do you? This state takes away EVERYTHING you have. It is neither happiness nor unhappiness. There is no such thing as happiness. This you do not, cannot, want. What you want is everything, here you lose everything. You want everything, and that is not possible. The religions have promised you so much—roses, gardens—and you end up with only thorns.

When these thoughts of “religion,” “God,” “soul,” “beatitudes,” “moksha” are not there, what is left is the simple, harmonious physical functioning of the organism. It functions in a state of not knowing. When hoping and attempting to understand is not there, then life becomes meaningful. Life, your existence, has a tremendous living quality about it. All your notions about love, beatitude, infinite bliss, and peace only block this natural energy of existence.

The saints, saviors, priests, gurus, bhagavans, seers, prophets and philosophers were all wrong, as far as I am concerned. As long as you harbor any hope or faith in these authorities, living or dead, so long this certainty cannot be transmitted to you. This certainty somehow dawns on you when you see for yourself that all of them are wrong.

When you see all this for yourself for the first time, you explode. That explosion hits life at a point that has never been touched before. It is absolutely unique. All that came before is negated in that fire. It is like accidentally touching a live wire. You are much too frightened to touch it through your own volition. By sheer accident this thing touches you, burning everything.

The energy here that is burning all thought as it arises tends to accumulate. Eventually it has to escape. The physical limitations of the body act as obstacles to the escape of this unique energy. When it escapes it goes up, never down, and never returns.

U.G. gesturing and talking. Credit: unknown

On Teachers

“You may be sure of one thing: He who says he is a free man is a phony. Of this you may be sure.”

The numerous solutions offered by all these holy people, the psychologists, the politicians, are not really solutions at all. That is obvious. If there were legitimate answers, there would be no problems. They can only exhort you to try harder, practice more meditations, cultivate humility, stand on your head, and do more and more of the same. That is all they can do. The teacher, guru, or leader who offers solutions is also false, along with his so-called answers. He is not doing any honest work, only selling a cheap, shoddy commodity in the marketplace. If you brushed aside your hope, fear, and naïveté‚ and treated these fellows like businessmen, you would see that they do not deliver the goods, and never will. But you go on and on buying these bogus wares offered up by the experts.

All their philosophies cannot compare to the native wisdom of the body itself. What they are calling mental activity, spiritual activity, emotional activity, and feelings are really all one unitary process. This body is highly intelligent and does not need these scientific or theological teachings to survive and procreate. Take away all your fancies about life, death, and freedom, and the body remains unscathed, functioning harmoniously. It does not need your or my help. You don’t have to do a thing. You will never again ask stupid, idiotic questions about immortality, afterlives, or death.

Those leaders who would direct your “spiritual life” cannot be honest about these things, for they make a living out of fear, speculations about future life, and the “mystery” of death. And as for you, the followers, you are not really interested in the future of man, only your own petty little destinies. It is just a ritual you go through, talking for hours and hours about mankind, compassion, and the rest. It is YOU that you are interested in, otherwise there would not be this childish interest in your future lives and your imminent demise.

As long as you think you have something to renounce, you are lost. Not to think of money and the necessities of life is an illness. It is a perversion to deny yourself the basic needs of life. Your self-denial is to enrich the priests. You deny yourself your basic needs while that man travels in a Rolls Royce car, eating like a king, and being treated like a potentate. He, and the others in the holy business, thrive on the stupidity and credulity of others. The politicians, similarly, thrive on the gullibility of man. It is the same everywhere.

You accept that there is something to change as an article of faith. You never question the existence of the one who is to be changed. The whole mystique of enlightenment is based upon the idea of transforming yourself. I cannot convey or transmit my certainty that you and all the authorities down through the centuries are false. They and the spiritual goods they peddle are utterly false. Because I cannot communicate this certainty to you it would be useless and artificial for me to get up on a platform and hold forth.

What I am trying to say is that you must discover something for yourself. But do not be misled into thinking that what you find will be of use to society, that it can be used to change the world. I am only saying that you must go find out for yourself if there is anything behind these meaningless abstractions being thrown at you. They talk of sacred hearts, universal minds, over-souls, you know, all the abstract, mystical terms used to seduce gullible people. Life has to be described in pure and simple physical and physiological terms. It must be demystified and depsychologized. Don’t talk of “higher centers” and chakras. It is not these but glands that control the human body. It is the glands that give the instructions for the functioning of this organism. In your case you have introduced an interloper—thought.

The spiritual people are the most dishonest people. I am emphasizing that foundation upon which the whole of spirituality is built. I am emphasizing that. If there is no spirit, then the whole talk of spirituality is bosh and nonsense. You can’t come into your own being until you are free from the whole thing surrounding the concept of “self.”

To be really on your own, the whole basis of spiritual life, which is erroneous, has to be destroyed. [You must build] a bonfire inside of you. Everything that mankind has thought and experienced must go. The incredible violence in the world today has been created by the Jesuses and Buddhas.

On Practices

Understanding your goal is the main thing. To achieve that goal implies struggle, battle, effort, will, that is all. There is no guarantee that you will reach your goal. You assume the goal is there. You have invented the goal to give yourself hope. But hope means tomorrow. Hope is necessary for tomorrow, not for today.

You know. You want more knowledge so you can develop better techniques for reaching your goal. You know that there is no guarantee that more experience, more knowledge, more systems and more methods will help you reach your goal. Yet you persist; it is all you know how to do. Seeing today demands action. Seeing tomorrow involves only hope.

You are using effort to be in an effortless state. How the hell can you use effort to be in an effortless state? You think that you can live an effortless life through volition, struggle, and effort. Unfortunately, that is all you can do. Effort is all you know. The “you,” and everything it has achieved, has been a result of effort. Effortlessness through effort is like peace through war. How can you have peace through war?

The “peace of mind” you want is an extension of this war of effort and struggle. So is meditation warfare. You sit for meditation while there is a battle raging within you. The result is violent, evil thoughts welling up inside you. Next, you try to control or direct these brutal thoughts, making more effort and violence for yourself in the process.

Any doing in any direction is violence. Any effort is violence. Anything you do with thought to create a peaceful state of mind is using force, and so, is violent. Such an approach is absurd. You are trying to enforce peace through violence. Yoga, meditations, prayers, mantras, are all violent techniques. The living organism is very peaceful; you don’t have to do a thing. The peacefully functioning body doesn’t care one hoot for your ecstasies, beatitudes, or blissful states.

All I am saying is that the peace you are seeking is already inside you, in the harmonious functioning of the body. Anything you do to free yourself from anything for whatever reason is destroying the sensitivity, clarity, and freedom that is already there.

The man who practices virtue is a man of vice. Only such a man, a man of vice, would practice virtue. There is not a virtuous man in the world. All men will be virtuous TOMORROW, until then they remain men of vice. Your virtue only exists in the fictitious future. Where is this virtue you are talking of?

You are blind. You see nothing. When you actually do see and perceive for the first time that there is no self to realize, no psyche to purify, no soul to liberate, it will come as a tremendous shock to that instrument. You have invested everything in that — the soul, mind, psyche, whatever you wish to call it — and suddenly it is exploded as a myth. It is difficult for you to look at reality, at your actual situation. One look does the trick; you are finished.

Spirituality is the invention of the mind, and the MIND IS A MYTH.

On Desire

It doesn’t matter what the object of that search is — God, a beautiful woman or man, a new car. It is all the same search. And that hunger will never be satisfied. That hunger must burn itself out completely without knowing satisfaction. The thirst you have must burn itself out without being quenched. It dawns on you that this is not the way, and it is finished. With the burning away of that hunger, the duality ceases. That is all.

Unless you are free from the desire of all desires, moksha, liberation, or self-realization, you will be miserable. The ultimate goal — which society has placed before us — is the one that has to go. Until you are free from that desire, you cannot be free from any of your miseries.

It is the desire to reach a particular goal, an all-important goal, that must go, not the countless petty little desires. The only reason you try to manipulate or control the petty desires is that such control is a part of your strategy to attain the highest goal, the desire of all desires. Eliminate that main goal and the others fall into a natural pattern and pose no problem for you or for the world. You won’t get anywhere by trying to endlessly control and manipulate these numerous desires. It is vicious in its nature.

The so-called “highest goal” is like the horizon. The further you move towards it, the further it recedes. The goal, like the horizon, is not really there. It is a projection of your own fear, and it moves away from you as you pursue it. How can you keep up with it? There is nothing that you can do. Still, it is desire that keeps you moving; no matter in which direction you move, it is the same.

There is no such thing as absolute. It is thought, and thought alone, that has created the absolute. Absolute zero, absolute power, absolute perfection, these have been invented by the holy men and “experts.” They kidded themselves and others. Down the centuries the saints, saviors, and prophets of mankind have kidded themselves and everybody else. Perfection and absolutes are false. You are trying to imitate and relate your behavior according to these absolutes, and it is falsifying you.

Wanting has to go. Wanting to be free from something that is not there is what you call “sorrow.” Wanting to be free from sorrow is sorrow. There is no other sorrow. You don’t want to be free from sorrow. You just think about sorrow, without acting. Your thinking endlessly about being free from sorrow is only more material for sorrow. It does not put an end to sorrow. Sorrow is there for you as long as you think. There is actually no sorrow there to be free from. Thinking about and struggling against “sorrow” is sorrow. Since you can’t stop thinking, and thinking is sorrow, you will always suffer. There is no way out, no escape.

On Suffering

Everything that is born is painful. There is no use asking why it is so. It is so. There is a solution for your problems — death. That freedom you are interested in can come about only at the point of death. Just let me warn you that if what you are aiming at — moksha — really happens, you will die. There will be a physical death, because there has to be a physical death to be in that state.

Suffering is an experience, and there is no experience here. You are not one thing, and life another. It is one unitary movement and anything I say about it is misleading, confusing. You are not a “person,” not a “thing,” not a discrete entity surrounded by “other” things. The unitary movement is not something which you can experience.

Your thought structure and your actual physiological framework are limited, but life itself is not. That is why life in freedom is painful to the body; the tremendous outburst of energy that takes place here is a painful thing to the body, blasting every cell as it goes.

On the Meaning of Life

You want to see meaning in your life. As long as you persist in searching for a purpose or meaning to life, so long whatever you are doing will seem purposeless and meaningless. The hope you have of finding meaning is what is causing the present state of meaninglessness. There may not be any meaning other than this.

You are obsessed with finding meaning in life, and that is consuming a lot of energy. If that energy is released from the search for meaning, it can be used to see the futility of all search. Life, the so-called material life, has a meaning of its own. But you have been told that it is devoid of meaning and have superimposed a fictitious layer of “spiritual” meaning over it.

Why should life have any meaning? Why should there be any purpose to living? Living itself is all there is. Your search for spiritual meaning has made a problem out of living. You have been fed all this rubbish about the ideal, perfect, peaceful, purposeful way of life, and you devote your energies to thinking about that rather than living fully.

You are living. As soon as you introduce the question “how to live,” you have made a problem out of life. “How” to live has made life meaningless. The moment you ask “how,” you turn to someone for answers, becoming dependent. If the idea of the meaningful is dropped, then you will see meaning in whatever you are doing in daily life.

On God

I personally feel that there is no power outside of man, you see — no power outside of man — whatever power is out there is inside man. So, if that is the case — and that is a fact to me — there is no point in externalizing that power and creating some symbol and worshipping it, you know? So that’s why I say that God, the question of God, is irrelevant to man today. I say that God is irrelevant to man because what “God” stands for is already there in man — there is no power outside of man — and that power has to express itself in its own way. That power is unable to express itself because of the burden of the past; when once he is freed from the burden of the past, then what is there, that extraordinary power, expresses itself.

God is the ultimate pleasure, uninterrupted happiness. No such thing exists. Your wanting something that does not exist is the root of your problem. Transformation, moksha, liberation, and all that stuff are just variations on the same theme: permanent happiness. The body cannot take that. Wanting to impose a fictitious, permanent state of happiness on the body is a serious neurological problem.

It never strikes you that the enlightenment and God you are after is just the ultimate pleasure — a pleasure, moreover, which you have invented to be free from the painful state you are always in. Your painful, neurotic state is caused by wanting two contradictory things at the same time. The problem is not psychological, but physiological.

What I am trying to put across is that there is no such thing as God. It is the mind that has created God out of fear. Fear is passed on from generation to generation. What is there is fear, not God. Wanting to be free from fear is itself fear. The ending of fear is death, and you don’t want THAT to happen. The death of fear is the only death.

On Grace

This is the ultimate: You have to totally surrender yourself. There is no jñana marga (path of wisdom); there is no marga (path) at all. It is total surrender — throwing in the towel, throwing in the sponge — and what comes out of that is jñana (wisdom). It is not surrender in the ordinary sense of the word; it means there isn’t anything you can do. That is total surrender — total helplessness. It can’t be brought about through any effort or volition of yours. If you want to surrender to something, it’s only to get something. That’s why I use the words “a state of total surrender.” It’s a state of surrender where all effort has come to an end, where all movement in the direction of getting something has come to an end. All wanting, be it this wanting or that wanting, is totally absent.

I renounce the only thing worth renouncing — the idea that there is renunciation at all. There is nothing to renounce. Your mistaken ideas regarding renunciation only create more fantasies about “truth,” “God,” etc.

I say [the natural state] cannot be transmitted to another because there is nothing there to transmit. Neither is there anything to renounce. Even your scriptures — the Kathopanishad — say that you must renounce the very search itself. The renunciation of renunciation happens not through practice, discussion, money, or intellect. A rough translation of the original Sanskrit is, “Whomsoever it chooses, to him it is revealed.” If this is so, then where is the room for practices, sadhana, and volition? It comes randomly, not because you deserve it.

Flowers

Man becomes man for the first time. Then only does he become an individual. For the first time he becomes an individual. He becomes the man, freed from all the animal traits in him. He is like a flower. This is like a flower. And each flower is unique. You become yourself. But each flower has its own fragrance. So such a man is of no use to the society; on the other hand he becomes a threat.

I have no message — no message for mankind — no message. People ask me, “Why the hell are you talking always?” When I say I can’t help anyone, “Why the hell are you here?” That is the fragrance of this flower. Such an individual cannot retire into a cave or hide himself; he has to live in the midst of this world; he has no place to go to. That is the fragrance of this particular flower — you don’t know what it is.

What Is the Ocean of Suffering?

As we saw in a previous post, the Ocean of Suffering was originally a Jain (Jaina) concept of the “ford-maker,” which was later borrowed by Buddhism and survives today, as do both religions. The image of a river or an ocean has been used for thousands of years as a metaphor for the endless cycle of death and rebirth, which human ignorance perpetuates with every birth through karma, and for the utter impossibility of crossing such an ocean without help. Since it has been used as a metaphor since ancient times, almost everyone born into an Eastern tradition has made reference to the Ocean of Suffering at one time or another.

For example, at one time U.G. said of it:

You put me on the other side of the river. You want to cross in a boat. That boat is a leaky boat, and you will sink. There is no other bank, and there is no river to cross, no boat — it is very difficult for you to understand that. You have created an image and put the image on the other side. I say, “No, for goodness’ sake! I am on the same bank, there is no river to cross, and no boatman is necessary!”

Using the same metaphor, Bodhidharma, Indian founder of Zen Buddhism and the tradition of the Shaolin Temple in China, once said in his sermons:

The Buddha said people are deluded. That’s why when they act they fall into a river of endless rebirth. And when they try to get out, they only sink deeper. And all because they don’t see their own nature. …

When we’re deluded, there’s a world to escape. When we’re aware, there is nothing to escape. When you’re deluded, buddhahood exists. When you’re aware, buddhahood doesn’t exist. That’s because buddhahood is awareness. When you’re deluded, you’re on this shore. When you’re aware, you’re on the other shore. But once you go beyond delusion and awareness, the other shore doesn’t exist.

Even the author of this site wrote at one time, while commenting on the “wall-gazing meditation” of Bodhidharma:

If the reality we experience is created entirely by the mind, then the process of enlightenment must begin as the process of navigating the psyche. Using the metaphor of a river or an ocean, the Buddha famously said that many leave, but very few arrive at the other shore. What the Buddha neglected to mention is that rather than sail or paddle across, the sincere seeker must crawl along the bottom as a blind crustacean, through the muck and filth — “a pair of ragged claws scuttling across the floors of silent seas.” It should come as no surprise if today very few even undertake the journey. But why crawl along the bottom? Because if you don’t hit bedrock, if you leave anything unexplored, it’s the same as leaving parts of your psyche dark and unexplored — and darkness cannot properly be called enlightenment. If you fear the contents of your mind, the journey across the Ocean of Suffering shouldn’t be attempted. (Aug. 2021, ed. April 2024)